Indian Classroom Scenario
Indian classroom is typically a mixture of varied ability groups of students. The roots of this phenomenon can be traced back to their socio-cultural and techno-economic backgrounds. They basically differ from one another in terms of cognitive development and therefore their capacity to grasp domain knowledge and to critically evaluate are bound to differ. Their ability to articulate their understanding of the subject also differs. Curriculum transaction to such a mixed classroom is not possible since one-size-that-fits all approach does not work well to the satisfaction of all the students in the class.
Criteria for Categorization of Students
Their score in the qualifying examination cannot be taken into account to identify the different categories of students such as advanced learners or high achievers, average learners, or slow learners as they belong to different boards. Moreover, the qualifying examination tests their memory skills in a group of related subjects. On the other hand, they have to specialize in one discipline at the tertiary level. Hence, their participation in the classroom activities, or their performance in the first continuous internal assessments (CIA) can be used as criteria to identify and categorize students with a view to devising different strategies for curricular transaction and to providing scaffolding for meaningful learning experiences. Students are usually streamed into three categories on the basis of pedagogical convenience. They are
- Advanced learners or high achievers who are quite visible,
- Average learners who are often but not always dependent on teachers, and
- Slow learners who need extra help outside the classroom.
Identification of Learning Styles
The institution is very careful not to create in students any psychological division and labeling them as particular type of learners. However, it is aware of general scholastic abilities (intelligence) of students. Teachers and mentors make a close observation of students’ learning styles:
- Some are field-dependent while others are field-independent;
- Some are divergent thinking while others are convergent thinking;
- Some are risk-taking while others are cautious;
- Some are reflective while others are impulsive;
- Some are outgoing (extroverted) while others are withdrawn (introverted);
- Some are active and energetic while others are lethargic and sluggish;
- Some have positive self-concept while others have negative self-concept.